WHAT IS VIRTUAL MOBILITY COACH?
The Ready State Virtual Mobility Coach is like having a virtual Kelly Starrett in your pocket.
Get early access to the latest promotions, blog articles, and all things to get you READY!
WHAT IS VIRTUAL MOBILITY COACH?
The Ready State Virtual Mobility Coach is like having a virtual Kelly Starrett in your pocket.
Relieve pain, prevent injury, and increase performance. Get customized mobility coaching developed by Dr. Kelly Starrett.
The Ready State 101 course reveals the core principles of Dr. Kelly Starrett’s coaching methods. Gain the expertise to improve anyone’s movement.
The Ready State 102 course is an advanced six-week online course with both self-paced material and LIVE virtual Q&A calls.
Get one-on-one remote movement and mobility coaching from a certified Ready State coach.
Apply for private coaching with the world's #1 movement and mobility expert.
Kelly Starrett’s custom pain protocols teach you the simple and effective methods to treat all your pain and stiffness—for good.
Look good while you mobilize!
Shop exclusive tanks, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats and more.
The TRS store offers a wide variety of mobility tools & kits perfect for your pre/post workout routines.
Kelly has written many books about movement, mechanics, and mobility which have made the New York Times bestseller list.
World-class experts reveal how to get — and stay — ready…for anything. Join hosts Dr. Kelly Starrett and Juliet Starrett for this eye-opening podcast.
Discover comprehensive resources and articles written by certified coaches and experts in the field.
The Ready State helps everyday athletes enjoy better movement, agility, and strength — with less pain and more protection against injury, especially as they get older.
Our work with elite athletes serves as the proving grounds for our methods. Most people don’t play professional sports. But if our methods help athletes at the highest levels, they can work for anyone.
Yeah that just seems like a weird business model.
Your philosophy is organic and all about helping people move better through the world – but you’re going to make them spend $750 plus the cost of travel and lodging and invest 3 days of their time in order to learn the most efficient way of correcting deficiencies. Otherwise , people can still figure it out on their own in a less efficient manner if they pay you less money on other material you have for sale.
I just feel that the philosophy of the “product” should be more inline with Louis C.K.’s business model – who made over a million dollars in 10 days.
Another great video that illustrates this point on Ted/Talks (go to 9:22 for the punch line):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMj_P_6H69g#t=563
I don’t think that this information should be given to everyone – I just think that it should be a lot easier to obtain the information given its intent in our world. Especially when he explains how to reach the goal so simplistically – which would allow SO MANY humans to live better lives.
Cook has a very fine gift – it’s a shame to restrict its impact.
I ended up playing some volleyball last night with my zero drop merrell’s. They worked pretty well. Very little ankle support, but with all of my foot strengthening exercises, they felt quite stable all night long. I also read a small blurb on the Altra running shoe site that the zero drop helps jump performance.
Also read in another article that the zero drop actually helps jumping by allowing greater dorsiflexion – which translates into allowing more muscle engagement.
I’m so torn with these materials.
I get that the information is great and that it would be a good read, but now that I know it won’t answer any questions and offer direct solutions to problems friends, family and myself may have – I just can’t justify purchasing it.
I’ve already done some research on Gray Cook. Read lots of articles, watched his videos, etc. I have a good understanding of his philosophy, and I’m sold on that. Now I just need to know how to act and correct accordingly. If the things he’s selling won’t do that, then I’m not sure what value they are.
At first I thought – Maybe they’re like buying lego’s. You can have instructions on how to put them together, or you can figure it out on your own. But the biggest difference to this analogy is that exercises and fitness can do more harm than good when not executed properly.
In my mind, the best way to go about learning the information would be to get level 2 certified – since that’s the only way to learn the corrections. Level 1 costs $379 – I’m not sure about Level 2. David can you shed some light on how to get Level 2 certified and the costs associated with that?
I wonder how many other people feel the same.
Yeah I’ve always heard Kelly reference research that has found it takes a minimum of 2 minutes to permanently change soft tissue.
I’ve never heard a maximum time mentioned. I would agree with Kaitlin – if you have the time and can handle the new range, keep going until you no longer gain additional ROM.
Carl Sipes is my trainer. He’s quite knowledgeable and he just ramped up my program last night.
Holy crap is he working the hell out of my core! All good stuff though. Between that program and a visit to my Chiro – my mobility on the volleyball court late last night was light years ahead of how I’ve been performing in the past.
Can’t wait until I’m well conditioned for the new program.
I think it’s an interesting concept.
1 – I think you should do so slowly.
2 – I think you should do so in front of a mirror.
3 – The 2 points above will help you ensure that you’re not rolling around an area of restriction.
4 – Possibly exaggerating the motion by doing a slight toe raise with every step. One way to help engrain a correct motor pattern is to add weight – in this case, your own body weight.
5 – Make sure you’re engaging your hip flexors and raising your femur high enough to allow for proper ankle ROM on the landing of each step.
Solid. Thanks David!
David!
I knew you’d come to the rescue! 😀
Thanks for the info. That sounds unfortunate. All of that great material – and if you don’t get level 2 certified, then you just have to try and put the pieces together yourself?
I wonder what the level 1 Certification does? I would think that’s at LEAST where the programming would taught.
Last year I read a lot of good things about it. This year I’ve seen some research referenced that shows PRP/Prolo therapy doesn’t do as much good as advertised.
This is what I asked myself: “What does Prolo therapy do?”
PRP specifically brings platelet rich plasma to the injured area. PRP is already found in blood. So if I can bring new fresh blood to the area, aren’t I accomplishing the same thing? If I can do so multiple times a day in conjunction with mobilizing the area – doesn’t this do an even better job?
If I do Astym or Graston and combine that with voodoo flossing, I feel that I’m doing the latter.
For how much prolotherapy costs – I just think you get more bang for your buck with the other, less invasive, options that are out there.
I’m curious to hear others’ thoughts. Prolotherapy doesn’t have a whole lot of literature out on the internet – so the more feedback we can get, the better.
Ah he said that I got a 1 because the rod I was holding overhead came forward too far.
Shoulder mobility sides were off – also found a possible impingement on the left shoulder. And my ankle mobility in the right leg was 2″ vs 0.5″ in the left.
I did not video the test 🙁 Wish I would have though.
I’ll definitely have to check those out. Thanks for sharing.
That’s good to hear some positive feedback.
What they teach makes sense, I just wish they could go into more detail about why it works. I tend to overthink things, and knowing all the theory behind a methodology always helps me.
FYI – I had my FMS assessment on Monday. I scored a 2 on everything except for my OH squat, which I got a 1. Once I put my heels up on the 2×4 I could go all the way down ATG.
For this first week he has me doing a few of the Original Strength exercises – rolling, rocking and basic crawling.
I get all that – but all of what you said further supports the argument that people shouldn’t have to go through a doctor to see a physical therapist.
I agree that the money spent is a great investment – but if one’s insurance covers x number of physical therapy sessions a year, then why do I need a doctor (who’s best interest is me NOT seeing a physical therapist if they’re a surgeon) to give me a referral in order to get that preventative treatment. Especially when they don’t understand the entire population.
Why? – Because the system is set up that way. My question is: Is the way the system is set up appropriate and in the populations best interest?
That’s really good to hear. 🙂 At least the ball is rolling, hopefully it won’t take too much longer for it to pick up some speed.
One thing I recently discovered, in Illinois, is that in order to even see get PT – you need to see an M.D. and get their referral. 2 of the 4 doctors didn’t even mention PT as a recommendation. I’ve said this before – one told me “These kinds of things just burn themselves out over time.” Looking back on this statement infuriates me. Really – they just burn themselves out? Are you referring to my tendon specifically so that you can get a surgery out of it???
The only reason I got Graston was because I called his office back after doing some research and asked why he hadn’t recommended that treatment. His nurse immediately said, “oh, we can definitely get you into our clinic area for that. I’ll talk to the doctor and get it all set up.” So I have to do the research myself and ask for non-surgical treatment? While I definitely support the idea of the general population being educated and knowing what options are available to maintain our bodies – I really think that the moral hazard here punishes those that don’t get enough information on their own.
Apparently in this state, because the AMA has bigger pockets, they are able to influence the health care to flow from the M.D.’s down. If this is the case, and they’re not recommending non-surgical procedures while leaving you prone to further injury, then this is a huge risk for patients.
Those 2 doctors I mentioned earlier were orthopedic surgeons – so it’s in their best interest for you to actually get worse.
I wonder how common this approach is in other states?
Do you think that’s a problem with the “system”?
I feel that PT’s should get you from pain to no-pain AND Full function. Trainers should increase performance once you’re at full function. Coaches hone in on the specific skills involved in an activity.
That’s “ideal” in my opinion. But if enough people think the same – then as a whole, maybe we can influence the system to change and be better for the general population.
Just a thought.
Thanks David! I’ll definitely share the results. I have a meeting setup for Monday with the trainer.
I love the concept of FMS. It’s always been what I thought would occur when seeing a doctor or PT.
4 Doctors and 4 PT’s later – The closest I’ve gotten is one PT watching me jump on 2 legs a couple of times. All he really noted was that I didn’t really go deep when I landed and that could be creating more impact on my joints than is ideal. He was the best PT I’ve seen, so I really don’t want to bash him, I just had a lot higher expectations.